Month: June 2013


Was reading over some of the ways famous writers have organized their works mentally and saw that their outlines represent a special kind of condensation of their thought process. The way they organize, plan, thread thought through thought.

I was particularly struck by Faulkner’s use of his office wall—so much space! And Joseph Heller’s outline is almost equally impressive.

Another little piece fell into place in my mind just now. I really want to indulge in the largest whiteboard or other writing surface I can find, even if I end up painting an entire room in whiteboard paint, just so I can have an enormous place to plan without geometrical limit.

I hadn’t actually realized how constraining I find linear outlines and small journals to be in that regard. I need room to explore time and points of view, to elaborate.

Maybe a computer can also give me that…


I want to talk a little about caprice. I want to talk about its invisibility; its influence; its implications on privilege; and its implications on me.

What is caprice? They’re the things that we can’t control. It’s the agent of luck, acts of God. It’s unfairness. We’re all subject to caprice to some extent, and it’s treated some of us very well, and in other cases, it’s treated us pretty badly. Or maybe it’s been a mixed bag for you. Either way, we have no idea what it has in store for us.

I have the fortunate quality of seeing caprice’s role in my life because I haven’t always had a safety net. I’ve spent a little time in jail. I’ve spent a little time being homeless. I’ve spent a lot of time being broke. I’ve let health issues impact me for years out of lack of options.

I realize that caprice is a bit harder to see when it’s always helped you along, silently privileging you and your accomplishments. This is due to a pretty well understood cognitive bias, and we’re all subject to it. We can begin to internalize “good” caprice. Now, as I write, I’m at a shiny conference full of rich people, watching them socialize in a big room full of expensive computers and robots, and I wonder how many people in this room recognize the role of caprice—of privilege—in putting them there.

I think my favorite talk so far of Open Source Bridge has been Cameron Adamez’s talk about labor, ethics, and computing. She did this really awesome thing that led to these thoughts and underscored the contrast I’ve seen in my adult life so far. First, she played a clip of a documentary about San Jose’s tent city. Of course, she followed this right away with a small clip from Chris Anderson talking to an audience of “makers” leading startups.

What does this have to say? The juxtaposition spoke volumes: about elitism, about exploitation, about class, and most especially about how caprice unites all these factors.

Disadvantaged and marginalized people know caprice much better than those whom caprice has treated well. We know the world is unfair. This plays into our impostor syndrome, unfortunately. For those whom caprice has mishandled, we’ve internalized, at some point, the idea that only some people deserve to be where they are. In other words, we are subject to a different cognitive bias, a kind of survivorship bias, which blinds us somewhat to role of caprice in others’ success or to valuing our own accomplishments later on when they’re recognized and rewarded.

How we react to this situation interests me. Some people seem to look at their marginalized peers, see themselves and their accomplishments, and conclude they do not deserve their own success.

I’ve had a little time to observe the situation and think about it, and I am much more tempted to conclude, on the other hand, that others do not deserve their success anymore than I. I look around at my peers and wonder, why aren’t you guys as awesome as I am? And it has little to do with me. There’s not necessarily anything special about me (though I do need to own my accomplishments). By and large there’s an element of stupid, uncaring, meandering luck.

I keep wondering, how can I spread this professional success, my tech accomplishments, to my friends who may be struggling, who are equally talented but in another place in life?

I’m suffering less, maybe, from an impostor problem and more of a survivor guilt. Or maybe a success guilt. Maybe impostor syndrome is just a way of turning this success guilt inwards on ourselves rather than acknowledging the fundamental unfairness of the world around us.

What’s Mozilla Doing These Days?

I’m inclined to forget about Google. I’ve mostly completed the steps that I need to transition away from their services. I’m sitting on the fence about transitioning my mail (which would be the biggest and final step).

I got to thinking about all that today after I remembered that my RSS subscriptions existed and started reading through those, when I fell down a rabbit hole leading from Google’s disregard for the XMPP standard (sorry about the Google Plus link) to a depressing discussion about PNaCl.

Google has built an empire upon the web, and for a few years there, I got this sense they were really going somewhere remarkable, like there was some shining, beautiful future just over the horizon built out of community standards and driven by smart, passionate engineers. Any day now, I thought, they’d unite Gmail and Talk and Voice and Reader into some amazing community platform and usher in the future. Yep. Any day now. Just got to wait.

Yeah, I’m not sure that’s going to happen anymore.

Sorry. This post isn’t even about Google. It’s about the web. The web doesn’t need a company—it never needed Google, at least. But there are a lot of companies, organizations, and communities that need the web. The web is going to tend towards openness, no matter what we do, if history is any indication. It was created with open standards, and we need it badly to remain that way.

Earlier today, I tweeted:

Open question: Can Mozilla become (or is becoming) what Google has failed to realize?

I’ve written this blog post to elaborate (more or less) on that thought. Twitter is a pretty poor medium for this kind of discussion. What I really meant to ask is, can Mozilla fully embrace its role as a good steward for the web and by extension the web’s role in our lives and communities?

I suppose this would imply Mozilla competing more directly with Google and creating services for productivity and interactivity in some fashion or another. I’m not even sure that this makes sense for them. But given the Firefox OS and their Persona single-login identity service, it feels to me like a logical progression to begin offering cloud services to compete with Google and Apple.

All of this, of course, assumes Mozilla’s making strategic moves into a competitive space they haven’t shown much interest in so far. And maybe they don’t have to. Does the web need a steward?

© 2017 Emily St*

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑